No State Sponsors, No Terror argument Research Paper

No State Sponsors, No curse argument - Research Paper archetypeJaspers article No State Sponsors, No Terror argues that terrorism thrives only with the aid of state sponsorship and support. Terrorism is by nature a covert operation and as such, states will not overtly admit complicity in terrorist activities. In this regard, terrorism represents the epitome of irregular warfare and confirms 6th century B.C. Chinese military general Sun Tzus contention that all warfare is based on deception. This essay analyses Jaspers No State Sponsors, No Terror and argues that while the most successful international terrorists have thrived with the aid of material state-sponsorship, terrorism can succeed with surface state-sponsorship. However, when the international legal definition of state-sponsorship of terrorism is used, it is tough to anticipate terrorism thriving without state-sponsorship. Therefore, Jaspers argument that terrorism will fade away without state-sponsorship is correct when the international legal definition of state-sponsorship of terrorism is applied.Summary.Jasper starts out by introducing the reader to Sun Tzus The Art of War philosophy which hinges on the concept that all warfare is based on deception. Jasper then moves on to describe the clandestine and secret operations of international terrorism. He describes the work of Hezbollahs terror master, Imad Fayez Mugniyeh, who happened to operate clandestinely since the early 1980s at the progress of 20.