Presidential vs. Parliamentary Political Systems Essay -- Political Sc

Presidential vs. Parliamentary Political Systems There be two main types of political systems, hotshot world a professorshipial system and the other being a parliamentary system. Both of them have their accept benefits as well as their own disadvantages. No political system can be perfect or can always have stability, but shown in history there are successful countries that use either one. Also there are countries that have failed with one of the two systems. Firstly there is the presidential system. There are many an(prenominal) characteristics to a presidential system. The first main pop out of a presidential system is how the executive is elected. The executive is a president who is elected to a fix term. Also a president is not only head of state, but is head of government. The president is the sole executive of the government. Even though there is a cabinet in a presidential system it does not have the power it does in a parliamentary system. The cabinet is chosen by th e president instead of chosen by the parliament. A president has to follow a constitution rather than following history. The president actually has a large part in the governments decisions. A big advantage to political scientists of the presidential system is that there is a separation of powers. The legislative branch being separate from the executive branch lets one another keep checks and balances on each other. This assures that no one branch will take over or attempt to take over the government. Another advantage of a presidential system is that the population elects the chief executive and the legislative branch. By winning a popular vote shows that most of a boorish is backing the executive which does not seem to cause revolution. The president can not dissolve an fiction as one can in a parliamentary system. Also in a presidential system there is the juridical branch, which is the court system. The discriminatory branch is important because it helps uphold the constitut ion. One of the last advantages of a presidential system is that there is more stability because a president is elected to a fixed term, where as in a parliamentary system a prime minister can be ousted at any time. A presidential system is not perfect, but it has its high and low points. The other type of political system being analyzed is a parliamentary system. A parliamentary system has its executive branch in ... ... be elected by the majority of the population of the country. Also there being a pen constitution in a presidential system doctors it easier to prefer because this explains the law precisely and accurately. In a presidential system there is a judicial branch which makes it fair to be tried for crimes, which is a plus too. I may be bias because I live in a country that has a presidential system, which is the United States and it is the most successful nation, but I notice that even if lived in another country I would envy our elan of government and would want to live here. A presidential government is by the far the most successful and fairest way to run a country.I feel that France is most comparable to the political system I prefer. It is semi-presidential, which is more effective than a parliamentary system. Their election process is similar to a presidential system, which shows a popular vote in the population wins. The parliament can censure the premier also, which is good because it does not let one part of government make any drastic changes without the parliament agreeing. I feel that France is most like my preferred type of political system because of these reasons.